Introduction. The article considers the main components of quality management of training of future physical culture teachers. Parametric characteristics (criteria, levels, indicators) for evaluating the quality of training are presented. Diagnostic tools are specified to characterize the strategic (potential), tactical (optimal), and operational (subject-operational) levels of quality management.

Materials and methods. The main research methods are the analysis of scientific literature, conceptual analysis and systematization of approaches to solving the problem of quality management of training of future teachers of physical culture, as well as a modified questionnaire by V. I. Baydenko.

Results. In the course of studying the scientific and theoretical aspects of the problem of quality management of the future teacher of physical culture, the concept of "criteria-diagnostic tools for quality assessment" is analyzed, and the criteria-level characteristics of this phenomenon are described.

Discussion. Based on the research, it is concluded that the criteria-diagnostic assessment of the quality of training of future physical culture teachers is carried out according to three criteria (conceptuality, subject-oriented physicality, realization of potential opportunities of future physical culture teachers) at the strategic, tactical, and operational levels.

Conclusion. It is concluded that parametric characteristics allow us to objectively assess the level of quality of training of future physical education teachers.

The main criteria for the quality of training of future physical culture teachers are defined;

A criterion-level characteristic of evaluating the quality of training of future physical education teachers is presented;

Diagnostic tools for evaluating the quality of training of future physical education teachers are defined.

1. Mishchenko E.S. (2016), Prikladnyey aspekty system menedzhmenta kachestva v uchrezhdeniyach vyschego obrazovaniay [Applied aspects of quality management systems in higher education institutions]. Izdatel'stvo Tambovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, Tambov, 208 p. (In Russian).

2. Moky V.S. (2017), Metodologiya transdisstiplinarnosti-4 [Methodology of transdisciplinarity-4]. ANOITT, Nalchik, 112 p. (In Russian).

3. Zhabakov V.E. & Kuzmin A.M. (2019), Upravlenie kachestvom podgotovki budushchih pedagogov fizicheskoj kultury v transdisciplinarnoj obrazovatelnoj srede [Quality management of training of future physical education teachers in a transdisciplinary educational environment]. Yuzhno-Ural'skiy gosudarstvennyy gumanitarno-pedagogicheskiy universitet, Yuzhno-Ural'skiy nauchnyy tsentr RAO, Chelyabinsk, 208 p. (In Russian).

4. Borisova T.P. (2012), Socialno-psihologicheskaya fenomenologiya kak metodologicheskaya osnova professionalnyh ozhidanij [Socio-psychological phenomenology as a methodological basis for professional expectations]. Vestnik universiteta, 1, 112–114. (In Russian).

5. Mokiy M.S. & Nikiforov L.S (2018), Metodologiya nauchnych isledovaniy (uchebnik dlya magistrantov) [Research Methodology (A textbook for undergraduates)]. Yurayt, Moscow, 255 p. (In Russian).

6. Elistratova I.V. (2008), Sistema upravleniya kachestvom obrazovatelnogo protsessa [Quality management system of educational process]. Monografiya, Nizhnetagil'skaya gosudarstvennaya sotsial'no-pedagogicheskaya akademiya, Nizhny Tagil, 167 p. (In Russian).

7. Budakova A.V., Smetanova Yu.V. & Bogomaz   S.A.  (2010), Psihologicheskaya bezopasnost kak uslovie razvitiya lichnostnogo potenciala [Psychological security as a condition for the development of personal potential]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 338,156–159. (In Russian)

8. Korostylyova L.A. & Kravchenko N.E. (1997), Pyti professionalnoy I lichnostnoy samorealizatsii [Ways of professional and personal self-realization of a person]. St. Petersburg, 172 p. (In Russian)

9. Shamova, T.I., Tretyakov I.I. Kapustin, N.P. (2002), Upravleniye obrazovatelnymi sistemami [Management of educational systems]. VLADOS, Moscow, 319 p. (In Russian).

10. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia O., Shavelson R.J. & Kuhn C. (2015), “The international state of research on measurement of competency in higher education”, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 393–411.

11. Baidenko V.I. (2006), Vyjavlenie sostava kompetenciy vypusknikov vuzov kak neobchodimy etap proektirovaniya GOS VPO novogo pokoleni [Identification of the competencies of University graduates as a necessary stage in the design of the STATE HPE of a new generation]. Issledovatel'skiy tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov, Moscow, 72 p. (In Russian).